UK fatalities at sea: Coroner’s Court, crisis response, and lessons for owners, charterers and operators in high-risk regions

In light of the recent escalation of conflict in the Middle East, the risks facing vessels, owners, charterers, crew, and personnel providers operating in the region have increased dramatically. Whilst we anticipate stakeholders are already reviewing and updating procedures to reduce the risks to vessels and crew, it is equally important to understand the legal and operational consequences if a UK crewmember is tragically killed at sea following an attack or incident. 

This article focuses specifically on the English and Welsh legal framework and provides practical guidance and key considerations for management and operations teams—highlighting how best to prepare and what to expect, should their vessel be targeted in a hostile incident involving a UK national.

A UK Coroner’s Court in England and Wales has jurisdiction to investigate the death of a UK citizen occurring outside the United Kingdom, where the body is subsequently repatriated to the Court’s jurisdiction. Even if the body is not recovered, there may still be an investigation into the death. Subject to jurisdiction, a coroner is under a duty to investigate where there is reason to suspect that the death was violent or unnatural or where the cause of death is unknown. Therefore, if you have UK citizens onboard and a fatality occurs due to a war risk, there is a likelihood that a coroner will open an independent inquest into the death of that individual.

Step one: The importance of a thorough and dynamic risk assessment cannot be overstated

The risk profile for any particular vessel will vary depending on a number of factors, including the vessel’s location, flag state, ownership, operator nationality, intended destination, and cargo.

Relevant intelligence and guidance are available from a variety of sources, including:

• industry guidance documents such as Best Management Practices (BMP) for Maritime Security
• intelligence provided by commercial maritime risk management companies
• the Joint War Committee (JWC) circulars
• the Maritime Industry Security Threat Overview (MISTO); and
• live operational updates from organisations such as UK Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) and the Maritime Security Centre – Indian Ocean (MSCIO)

Operators can develop internal risk hierarchies or scoring frameworks to identify which vessels and voyages present the greatest exposure to assist with their assessments.

It is essential for operators to have a clear understanding of what information is available—whether publicly accessible or obtained through private channels—and to ensure that this intelligence is actively analysed and incorporated into their current risk assessments. Regularly updating risk assessments with the latest data and insights is critical for maintaining an accurate picture of evolving threats and for making informed operational decisions. Given the events unfolding in the Middle East, the frequency of such reviews could be daily. Failing to do so can leave vessels and crews exposed to risks that could otherwise have been anticipated and mitigated and the Coroner will assess whether or not an opportunity was missed.

Step two: Risk management plans should be tailored to the specific vessel and voyage

Generic policies are unlikely to be sufficient in a rapidly evolving threat environment. The UK Department for Transport has recently issued guidance on countering drone threats to shipping, but such threats evolve quickly and response strategies should therefore be reviewed regularly.

Possible measures may include enhanced vessel affiliation checks, selective management of AIS transmission, differential routing through higher-risk areas, and—where appropriate—the use of additional physical security measures such as onboard security personnel.

The threat posed by drones and unmanned surface vessels (USVs) is now well established. It is of course self-evident that the defensive capabilities available to naval vessels are not available to merchant shipping, however, operational planning can still play a role in reducing exposure. For example, careful consideration may be given to crew accommodation and operational arrangements in order to minimise the presence of personnel in areas of the vessel that are more likely to be targeted in an attack.

It is essential that onshore personnel and vessel managers ensure that all risk management plans and updates are not only communicated but also received, understood, and implemented onboard. Given the demands on crew, it is easy for updates to be missed or documentation to go unread. Operations teams must ensure that critical information relayed to the vessel is acknowledged and acted upon. Maintaining checks and records of this process is invaluable in the event of an incident, as it provides clarity on who knew what, and when.

Continue to read the full article here.